Google Maps thinks Americans are fat

So, if a New Yorker wishes to visit me in sunny Coventry, England, he may well ask Google Maps the best way to get here. Take a note of item 23...



Are Google Maps inferring that my cross-Atlantic cousin needs more exercise?

Grand Turismo HD Concept 2.0 PlayStation 3 video game review ★★★★★ ★★★☆☆

★★★★★ ★★★☆☆
A generous freebie letting PlayStation 3 owners see what they bought their console for. While it's not exactly worth £425 (the price of a new console at launch), it is comfortably the most satisfying and impressive free download ever offered on any console.



Technically it's lovely with a rock-solid frame-rate, highly convincing graphics (replays are the closest we've ever come to photo-realistic) and sound.

The Gran Turismo handling is present and correct with the first-person view a delight to use thanks to the amount of visual feedback that is delivered. Remarkably, you don't miss rumble at all. Though Gran Turismo was a pioneer of rumble feedback,

don't miss rumble

it's always been the the dipping and leaning of the first-person view that provided all the feedback that makes this series so much better to drive that just about all other driving games. As has been the case with every entry so far, just driving in this game is better than racing, blowing stuff up, using the Force and saving the world in almost all other games.

Gameplay-wise it offers something not found in any Gran Turismo game to date - a dedicated Drift Trial mode - but it would have been nice if target times had been supplied for all the variations in the game (only ten of the sixty time trials have a target time: Time Trial / Normal Cars / Forward direction).

pointlessly easy

Also the ten target times supplied are pointlessly easy. If sixty representative times had been supplied, then there would be absolutely no cause for complaint and the demo would have been much much better. A Gold / Silver / Bronze system would have been the icing on the cake.

That said, it seems rather pernickety to moan about free content. Instead of being challenged by Polyphony Digital you have to content yourself with challenging online times. Generally, these are hilarious but I've set myself the standard of giving myself a Gold with a top 100 provisional ranking. Managed it once so far (best 56th) and, frankly, rather pleased with that.

With it being a downloaded game, it is always on your PlayStation 3 ready for five minutes here (which always turns into half-an-hour) without needing to find the game disc.



Please note: the bestest free download ever is "Trackmania Nations ESWC Edition" which was an unlimited, uncrippled full free game and, currently, the greatest online racer ever. It was supplied as part of the Electronic Sports World Cup in 2006.

Creative Brilliance

While writing my previous post about a Creative bug I found an even better one.

I was watching a DVD when I started to write the post. I had sound. I paused the DVD and started writing.

While writing the post I opened the Control Panel windows to make sure I was getting the names right. I then closed and canceled my way back out. I changed nothing.

I went to continue watching the DVD... and my digital output was disabled. Brilliant.

Creative X-FI Digital I/O Quirk on Windows XP

Creative products have always been a little, well, quirky (the less charitable might say buggy). Which seems odd for the world's largest and most expensive consumer soundcard manufacturer.

Quirks like undistorted 5.1 sound not being available in otherwise reference quality racing game "Flatout 2". Or never having a digital optical or coax out. Or insisting that you must use their fairly cheap cable to connect your £200 sound card to your expensive multi-channel amplifier.

I bought myself a Creative X-FI along with the digital I/O module. I use a multi-channel connection for gaming and music and the digital optical output on the I/O module for DVD's. I should mention that I am thrilled with the sound quality on the card. It is a distinct pleasure to listen to music or be surrounded by detailed sound effects in games that support it.

The quirk

Whenever the machine is restarted, the digital output doesn't work. Therefore, if I play a DVD in PowerDVD I get no sound from either the digital output (which PowerDVD is trying to use) or the multichannel output (because PowerDVD is attempting to use digital output).

The Fix

The fix is to go into Control Panel -> Sounds and Audio Devices -> Volume: Advanced. From the Playback volume window select Play Control -> Advanced then uncheck and recheck "Enable Digital IO". Close, close, OK. Digital IO is now restored.

The solution is simple enough but why should I have to perform it? Especially as Creative stack my startup sequence with so-called 'helper' utilities that never explain what they do or why they should be left running.

Stuntman PlayStation 2 video game review ★★★★★★★☆☆☆

★★★★★ ★★☆☆☆
Reflections take a genius game design (a mission-based driving action game which is NOT violent) and wraps it up in a cruel package which delivers exhilarating rewards but is more likely to make you want to cry and stab your PlayStation 2 to death. With two stunt sequences left in the game and an urge to throw the PS2 controller only just resisted, I had to retire.

CONTENT
Classified OK 11+ by ELSPA. Content OK 11+.




Indicative of the meanness of this game is the fact that the director has the same voice clip for a successful scene and an unsuccessful scene. He simply says "Cut" in a rather unimpressed voice. Surely, for a successful scene it would have been nicer for him to say "That's a wrap. Great work." or something.

Here's another one. The director calls out instructions. However, he doesn't call them all out. For example, in the Bond-alike movie "Live Twice For Tomorrow" you are tasked with "Get close and overtake on the right". You do that and he promptly fails the take for not staying ahead of the helicopter. This is needlessly, sadistically cruel.

Another item on "Live Twice for Tomorrow" tells you to overtake on the right but there's always been a car in the way every time I've attempted it. He then tells you to overtake on the left but the icon turns red (indicating stunt failure) before you even get there.

How about invisible scenery? In the Indiana Jones-alike movie, you bash two trucks out of the way in order to tackle a jump. But there is a piece of invisible scenery on the right of the road so if you head down there your car will crumple up as if you'd just driven into a concrete block. On that movie's Temple Trap level there is a rock which is much wider than it's graphic. Not quite as bad as invisible scenery is scenery which you can get caught on way too easily. The worst culprit here is roadside kerbs. Sometimes you can ride them. Sometimes it will throw your car up in the air removing your control and destroying the take. This isn't different kerbs on different kerbs, this is the same kerb on the same level. A kerb you ride a few times may end the take the next time. Also this is a game where you have to snick through tight spaces, yet the game designers thought it would be fun to put tiny little jutty-out bits of scenery, added detail and flavour presumably. These simply shouldn't exist.

The other vehicles in the game are also unfair. They speed up into you and never avoid an accident with you. Aren't they supposed to be highly trained stunt drivers aswell? It is anachronistic for them to keep causing accidents.

The handling of the car is a sore point. You can never quite get used to it because Reflections have kept a little invention from the "Driver 2" PlayStation game: the automatic handbrake. This means that sometimes when you turn strongly left or right, the handbrake is automatically applied making for a more spectacular cornering style. Unfortunately, it is not consistent and you never know when the auto-handbrake is going to be applied. Because it is always a surprise, your car always ends up facing in completely the wrong direction whenever it is applied. Take the same corner twice and once you'll understeer, once your car will spin around. In "Driver 2" this 'feature' could be disabled, making the game playable (in fact, most negative reviews of that game were clearly conducted by people who left the auto-handbrake enabled). Here there is no choice. You have random cornering ability whether you want it or not.

In fact, this is largely a game where none of the sharp bits were sanded down and, as such, reflect a game that is not finished and where such important gameplay details were simply not considered as important as Atari and Reflections bank balance.

The game also suffers from technical issues with the occasional ugly popping of textures (textures that are blurry and become clearer when you get closer but you shouldn't be able to spot when the game does this) and, much more critically, frame rate fluctuations. These fluctuations normally occur at the absolute worst time. For example, one occurs as you attempt to land a motorbike and sidecar on a very small temple rooftop making an already tricky stunt significantly harder.

Outside of the entirely brilliant premise there are some other things that the game does well. Probably the most notable of these is the trailers for the movies you film the stunt sequences for. Brilliantly, these trailers feature your actual stuntwork, not a pre-rendered or pre-driven sequence. For example, of the "Dukes of Hazzard"-style movie, I missed a chimney during a jump and that miss was in the trailer. Likewise on the Bangkok thriller Blood Oath, a bizarre but successful landing of mine was in the trailer. This is an exceptional detail, great appreciated.

Largely speaking, the replays are good and generally make your driving and stuntwork look better than it felt or did while performing the stunt.

This is such a missed opportunity, it is so close to greatness that it is upsetting. The Stuntman franchise is getting a belated sequel in 2007 but Reflections are not involved at all and, sadly, that may be a good thing.

Good Superfi

Had a much nicer experience with Superfi this week than with the repair / replacement of my projector. I was having an issue with 1080p output of the PlayStation 3 with certain content (specifically, Gran Turismo HD Concept 2.0) whereby the picture would go blank for a second or two frequently. The issue doesn't occur on 720p or 1080i output (as set in the PS3 system menu).

My PS3 is plugged into a receiver and the projector is plugged into that. The problem doesn't occur when the projector is plugged directly into the PS3 and so the HDMI cable linking the PS3 and receiver was the obvious culprit. I was using a £10 HDMI cable bought off eBay which had functioned perfectly with an upscaling Denon DVD player at 1080p but which I figured was having dramas here. So I purchased a £50 QED HDMI cable from Superfi and explained the situation to them.

However, using this more expensive cable made no difference whatsoever (as it turns out the problem is reported on the web and is generally thought to be a PS3 HDCP quirk). Superfi agreed to take the cable back and refund the price without any hassle at all. Indeed, in this instance, dealing with them has been a distinct pleasure.

Grand Prix Challenge PlayStation 2 video game review ★★★★★★★★☆☆

★★★★★ ★★★☆☆
Challenging and very good-looking PlayStation 2 Formula One game whose only real deficiency comes on the hardest AI difficulty levels where you will probably notice the computer opponents have an unfair advantage or two. However, you can mostly play around that to enjoy the genuine challenge and thrill of the best Formula One game on the PlayStation 2.

Critically, the handling is predictable and learnable but challenging and satisfying once it starts coming together. It's very easy to drive fast on the Intermediate handling level but there is more to learn on the Expert handling level. Most of the game lets you choose both the AI difficulty and the handling level. The cars feel like they can corner and accelerate in an astonishing manner which is at it should be.

The cars feel like they can corner and accelerate in an astonishing manner

A number of F1 games have made the cars too twitchy to drive and made them impossible to accelerate while exiting corners. They claim this is realistic and accurate but "tosh!" to that. Anyone can see how F1 cars drive by watching them every couple of weeks on their television. You never see F1 drivers struggling to drive in a straight line like you do in a lot of so-called simulations. You don't see them creeping around 150mph corners and waiting to get the car back on to a straight before nervously stroking the throttle. No, they barrel around corners, leave braking unbelievably late and stand on the throttle any chance they get. Grand Prix Challenge gets this handling down and couples it to a nice sense of speed. At times, you can't believe just how fast you can take a corner if you get everything right, it seems to take entire seconds off your lap time.

It reminded me a bit of the F1 car in "Gran Turismo 3: A-spec". During the game you thought you were driving some high performance cars, and you were. But the F1 car was something else. It's acceleration was a bit better but the braking and cornering were absolutely astonishing. It's performance was modeled just as accurately as the other cars in the game and the difference between even the full race specification sports cars and the F1 car was night and day. A F1 car is a special car, even among race cars. Grand Prix Challenge successfully makes this game feel entirely different to touring car, sports car and other racing games.

F1 brake engineers ... would be making their brakes out of grass instead of that stupid carbon fibre rubbish.

There are many F1 and sim-racing fans who might not be as happy with the driving model as me. It is accessible, easy to learn, and moderately challenging to get good at. It is also fun to drive. This game also doesn't employ the standard F1 game tactic of a number of switchable driving aids that Geoff Crammond introduced in "Formula One Grand Prix" (aka "World Circuit") and that everybody else copied. It's simply easy to learn and fun to master. One last note regarding the driving model is one that is, again, common to a number of driving games. Why does grass slow you down faster than standing on the brakes? Clearly, F1 brake engineers haven't spotted this. If they had, they would be making their brakes out of grass instead of that stupid carbon fibre rubbish.

This is a racing game which demands concentration and commitment and delivers greater psychological rewards because of it. For example, after being somewhat humiliated in my first race at the game's default medium difficulty I decided to practice and qualify for the following round. I qualified 6th and had a most enjoyable race, getting up to second position by the end of lap two (of five) then taking the lead on lap four. I couldn't relax for the last lap as Schumacher was right on my tail but I held my concentration and won the race. I was delighted.

Collision detection translates to a box around the cars and, while this may not be accurate, it does mean that you can enjoy more argy-bargy with the opposition than is normal in an open wheel racing game and you won't get your wheels interlocked (a common but rubbish occurrence on even the best open wheel racing games).

ups the fun factor

This makes the game more fun because you can get into the action without being certain than any overtaking maneuvre will end your race. The damage is also very forgiving allow you to bump and jostle much much more than in other open wheel racing games before it starts to have a serious impact on your performance. Again, this ups the fun factor and is a good thing.

However, the difficulty balance and gameplay illusions starts to unravel slightly the better you become.

The computer cars are constantly jostling among themselves meaning that, most commendably, they don't finish in the same order every time you race. They are very aggressively tuned meaning that there is lots of overtaking of you and by you and plenty of action in your race.

...the game cheats...

This is fine but the game cheats badly with the computer cars to make it happen. Now these are my observations and they may not be technically accurate if you ask the programmers but it is how things appear while racing.

AI cars are not affected by the surface they are driving on whether it is tarmac, grass or gravel. AI cars do not appear to be affected by tyre wear. AI cars cannot have their speed altered by you hitting them or by you being on the fastest racing line. AI cars do not experience lateral G-forces on their car meaning they can overtake you even if you weave in front of them (in fact, an AI car can rub along one side of your car and then instantly overtake you on the other). AI cars are not slowed down by driving into the side of you, in fact, you car slows down if it touches an AI car, even if the AI car touches from behind. When an AI car touches you your tyres lose a lot of grip (meaning you cannot brake, steer or accelerate as desired) but theirs are not affected. Slamming into the back of an AI car under braking makes no difference to the AI cars speed or line. AI cars jostling for position do not slow each other down because their speed is not affected by their adherence to the racing line. AI cars will almost always have enough speed to move back in front of you completing an overtake no matter how long or short a straight is. This means that you will frequently smash into the back of them as they slam their car in front of you and stand on the brakes.

Even on Intermediate AI, this cheating is apparent but a bit of practice can make you largely fast enough to compensate but on Hard AI…

This is probably most notable on Monza where the computer cars always go around corners faster than you and accelerate down the straights faster than you. They also bump you off line without impacting their own speed or line; in fact, they can bump you off line and go around you on a gravel trap without any problem whatsoever. No matter what downforce / gear ratio I used I couldn't match their acceleration or corning ability on this track. In the end, I was forced to cheat (by cutting the first chicane and not overtaking anyone) just to remain competitive. This gave me a handful of laps that were three seconds faster than the pole position time and, on those laps, the lead computer cars still hauled in my dishonest advantage (it gains you about five seconds) and drove right by me. Dispiriting is not the word. Cheating is. Racing on Monza on Hard AI / Expert handling is not a fun experience. Not even a little bit.

At a lot of the circuits outside of Monza, you can tune your car, practice, get pole position and, largely, keep a podium position or victory with a clean enjoyable race. On Hard AI / Expert handling I have

...enjoyed a number of thrilling races...

enjoyed a number of thrilling races at most of the circuits but if you ever get caught back in the pack or even by a couple of the top three it is not uncommon to find yourself getting pushed off the racing line and then watching the AI cars consistently re-overtake you regardless of how fast a lap you put in.

That said, regarding Monza, if you are competing in a World Championship on Hard AI / Expert handling things do balance themselves out because the AI are rubbish on the Hungaroring. You could probably drive around in your own real car and beat them.

AI cheating is unacceptable...

This AI cheating is unacceptable though commonplace in games. Your opponents should have the same circumstances as the player. Even though AI drivers don't literally drive around in a car modeled like the player, it should represent as close an approximation as is possible and things like track surface should always, always, always be taken into account. That said, graphics sell games and Grand Prix Challenge has lovely smooth graphics. In this case, it has been at the expense of fair AI opponents.

Staying out of the way of the computer opponents is critical to performing well on the Hard AI setting. After having my posterior posted to me upon trying the Championship with Hard AI and Intermediate handling, it was with some trepidation that I hit the Blue Skies Grand Prix Challenge where you are forced to play against Hard AI with Expert handling. Now it took me a good number of laps to figure out but the Expert handling employs a pretty significantly different physics model for your car, one where your setup has a more complex effect. For example, in Intermediate handling, altering Downforce basically gave you car more speed and acceleration with only minor effects on cornering noticeable at the extreme ends of the available settings. In Expert handling, the downforce also massively affected stopping ability and cornering ability. Once you realise that this is a whole different game and that you have to learn new, slightly earlier, braking points, you can get back up to speed but it is a significant and surprising change as you move from the one handling level to the next.

I put some time into the Blue Skies Grand Prix Challenge, performing better each time (qualified on pole for my last two attempts) and finally, after abandoning my hard tyres, long stint tactic, tried the race on soft tyres and just eked them out to the pit stop and then to the end of the race. I won the race and was elated. My heart was in my helmet for the last few corners even though I had built up a twelve-second lead. As I exited the last corner and straightened the car for the finish line, I put my left (steering) hand in the air with a triumphant single finger of victory. Number One! Yay! Just got to do it again, now…

Grey Skies Challenge was not one I was looking forward but, thankfully, the game's wet weather handling doesn't make the track an ice-rink (as it does in most racing games) and gives you the impression that you are driving a car with immense grip (provided you stack the downforce on in your car setup).

Agreeably, records are maintained no matter which mode you are in. I do find it stupid that you often find that your best times (which will have happened in a full blown race / qualifying most likely) are not listed in the Records page of most racing games. Usually, these pages only list the times achieved in the dedicated Time Trial mode. Which is stupid. In this game, the records page has just that: the records for the game.

We have a small but rewarding innovation in the mini-game in the pitstop.

rewarding innovation... mini-game in the pitstop

Here you have to select your strategy, then press the accelerate button to fill up a bar. Depending on how much you fill this bar, another bar then appears and gets smaller. The fuller the first bar, the faster the second bar shrinks. You then press the accelerate button to stop the second bar shrinking. The closer the second bar is to half-size the faster your pit stop will go. You can gain up to a highly satisfying and potentially critical four seconds. The best I've done in race conditions is about 3.8 seconds.

Another nice touch is that the game automatically picks up whether your PlayStation 2 is in Widescreen mode or not. This happens so infrequently that it is a slightly bemusing surprise when it happens.

Sound effects are very good with the only downer being that they are not in surround sound. However, the cars have powerful screaming (but not annoying) engine tones and the audio feedback is consistently accurate and helpful. Your car sound effect changes as you change driving view placing more and less emphasis on the exhaust note as you move from inside the car to outside the car. Also impressive are the environmental sound effects with crowds that ooh, aah and cheer depending on what you are doing. Wheel-to-wheel action, off-road excursions, overtaking and crossing the finish line deliver gratifying crowd feedback. Impressively, this only seems to happen when you are actually in view of a crowd.

This is a really nice effect that I wish would become a standard feature in racing game audio.

This is a really nice effect that I wish would become a standard feature in racing game audio. At Suzuka you can hear the fun of the fair when you pass. At Monaco you get seagulls. There are also loudspeaker announcers at each circuit.

Speaking of Suzuka, it is noted with great delight that the fairground is animated. The Ferris Wheel is turning and the gravity drop ride goes up and drops. I couldn't quite see as I passed at 160mph whether there were cars going around the roller coasters. This is an appropriate point to mention that the crowds are generally very well done. There are flags waving (sometimes different flags, on one track I was using a Scotland flag as a braking point, next time I played it wasn't there!), camera flashes being fired and the occasional coloured smoke flare being set off. Animated marshalls would have been nice but there are no marshalls on these tracks at all. (Flag status is shown via an icon at the top of the screen.)

The developers claim that the game runs at a constant 60 frames-per-second and this gives the game super-smooth motion. The frame rate does wibble briefly if you look backwards or change view but during normal gameplay I was very impressed by the graphical sheen on the game. Each team is individually modeled meaning that the Ferrari car looks very different from the Orange car, for example, not just in decoration but in shape. This is a great detail. All the camera views are all highly usable. There are five: Nose (no part of the car is visible, like "Gran Turismo"'s default view), Driver (where you can see your hands and steering wheel, the view I used), T-bar (like you generally get on the television), Close Behind and Far Behind. The game sometimes remembers your favoured view.

There are some graphical grumbles but these are all very minor and were probably sacrificed to get the more important smooth frame rate. Your driver isn't animated for gear changes but his head does wobble at high speeds. There is very minor graphical damage in the game. Your rear wing can appear crooked and the front and rear wings can come off. You can knock tyres off and make them wobbly but all this takes some doing. There are no pit crews. There are no marshalls. The onboard driving views and close behind view seem to make your car feel larger than it is. In these views your car generally feels a little under half the width of the track. In the replay and far behind view the car appears to be correctly proportioned and is generally about a quarter or a fifth the width of the track. Interestingly, this is something that affects most racing games and it doesn't affect the gameplay too badly here. In fact, you probably wouldn't notice it unless some pedantic twit pointed it out.

In conclusion,

outstanding

the only real thing knocking a star or two off is the cheating AI but, as I said, this is only noticeable on the hardest difficulty settings and can largely be driven around. Otherwise, this is an outstanding F1 game and a outstanding racing game. It is fun, thrilling and satisfying to play.

I purchased this in 2007 after discovering it while looking for reviews for the PlayStation 3 title "Formula One Championship Edition". I didn't even know the game existed but as soon as the review mentioned the developers Melbourne House I went out and bought it. Melbourne House were responsible for one of my favourite racing games "Le Man 24 Hours" on the Dreamcast, a game which I gladly completed and even raced and enjoyed a full 24-hour race (it took me ten or so days!).

Zaphs unofficial Grand Prix Challenge Page

Dry Setups

Common: Soft tyres, Brake Balance 7

A1 Ring: Downforce 9. Gear Box Ratio 2, Suspension 10
Barcelona: Downforce 7, Gear Box Ratio 3, Suspension 9
Hockenheim: Downforce 9. Gear Box Ratio 2, Suspension 10
Imola: Downforce 11, Gear Box Ratio 1, Suspension 9
Magny Cours: Downforce 6, Gear Box Ratio 3, Suspension 9
Monte Carlo: Downfroce 11, Gear Box Ratio 1, Suspension 8
Montreal: Downforce 7, Gear Box Ratio 3, Suspension 9
Monza: Donwforce 4, Gear Box Ratio 9, Suspension 9 (not good setup)
Nurburgring: Downforce 9, Gear Box Ratio 2, Suspension 10

Wet Setups

Common: Wet tyres, Brake Balance 7

Sepang: Downforce 11, Gear Box Ratio 3, Suspension 8
Silverstone: Downforce 11, Gear Box Ratio 2, Suspension 8